A Gentle Introduction to Argumentation Semantics
نویسنده
چکیده
This document presents an overview of some of the standard semantics for formal argumentation, including Dung’s notions of grounded, preferred, complete and stable semantics, as well as newer notions like Caminada’s semi-stable semantics and Dung, Mancarella and Toni’s ideal semantics. These semantics will be treated both in their original extension-based form, as well as in the form of argument labellings. Our treatment includes a sketch of few algorithms for skeptical as well as for the credulous approach to argumentation.
منابع مشابه
Abstract argumentation semantics: from limits to perspectives
argumentation semantics: from limits to perspectives Pietro Baroni DII Dip. di Ingegneria dell’Informazione University of Brescia (Italy) Roadmap Introduction and review Dung’s framework is (almost) nothing A directed graph (called defeat graph) where: » arcs are interpreted as attacks » nodes are called arguments “by chance” (let say historical reasons) Dung’s framework is (almost) nothing
متن کاملAn introduction to argumentation semantics
This paper presents an overview on the state of the art of semantics for abstract argumentation, covering both some of the most influential literature proposals and some general issues concerning semantics definition and evaluation. As to the former point the paper reviews Dung’s original notions of complete, grounded, preferred, and stable semantics, as well as subsequently proposed notions li...
متن کاملPreferential model and argumentation semantics
Although the preferential model semantics is the standard semantics for non-monotonic reasoning systems, it is not used for argumentation frameworks. For argumentation frameworks, instead, argumentation semantics are used. This paper studies the relation between the two types of semantics. Several argumentation semantics are related to additional constraints on the preference relation over stat...
متن کاملExpressing Extension-Based Semantics Based on Stratified Minimal Models
Extension-based argumentation semantics is a successful approach for performing non-monotonic reasoning based on argumentation theory. An interesting property of some extension-based argumentation semantics is that these semantics can be characterized in terms of logic programming semantics. In this paper, we present novel results in this topic. In particular, we show that one can induce an arg...
متن کاملTowards Constraints Handling by Conflict Tolerance in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
In this paper we incorporate integrity constraints in Dung-style abstract argumentation frameworks. We show that even for constraints of a very simple form, standard conflict-free semantics for argumentation frameworks are not adequate as conflicts among arguments should sometimes be accepted and tolerated. For this, we use conflict-tolerant semantics and show how corresponding extensions may b...
متن کامل